
<?phpxml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>
<channel>
<title>Sphinn / Hot Today / Google SEO</title>
<link>http://sphinn.com</link>
<description>Sphinn  votes</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 08:43:26 PST</pubDate>
<language>en</language>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Google's Top 10 for SEO by SearchWiki]]></title>
<link>http://sphinn.com/story/87818</link>
<comments>http://sphinn.com/story/87818</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 08:43:26 PST</pubDate>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<category>Google SEO</category>
<guid>http://sphinn.com/story/87818</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Tad makes some great improvements to Google's rankings for SEO, with a bit of help from SearchWiki!<br/><br/>46 Vote(s) ]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[SEO Question: does a non-indexed page pass on PageRank?]]></title>
<link>http://sphinn.com/story/87791</link>
<comments>http://sphinn.com/story/87791</comments>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 09:08:53 PST</pubDate>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<category>Google SEO</category>
<guid>http://sphinn.com/story/87791</guid>
<description><![CDATA[&quot;Google calculates PageRank on the total network of sites Google has in its index. From that point of view a non-indexed page can't accumulate PageRank, because Google can't determine the relative value the page. Or can it?&quot;<br/><br/>56 Vote(s) ]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Google penalizes Video Bloggers for Keyword Stuffing [HUMOR]]]></title>
<link>http://sphinn.com/story/87104</link>
<comments>http://sphinn.com/story/87104</comments>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 00:43:53 PST</pubDate>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<category>Google SEO</category>
<guid>http://sphinn.com/story/87104</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Google recently announced amongst the inner SEO circle headed up but Matt Cutts that they have developed a way to penalize video bloggers who are ‘Stuffing' their video blog posts with keywords!<br/><br/>35 Vote(s) ]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Confirmed: Bounce Rate is A Search Engine Ranking Factor]]></title>
<link>http://sphinn.com/story/86981</link>
<comments>http://sphinn.com/story/86981</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 05:43:26 PST</pubDate>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<category>Google SEO</category>
<guid>http://sphinn.com/story/86981</guid>
<description><![CDATA[SEO continues to evolve. Need more evidence that Google uses bounce rate to test their SERPs?Here's are screenshots from one of my sites (it's a &quot;white hat&quot; site or I wouldn't be posting the footprint here). The first shows overall traffic:<br/><br/>39 Vote(s) ]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Google Releases Bloggers Best Practices Guide]]></title>
<link>http://sphinn.com/story/86562</link>
<comments>http://sphinn.com/story/86562</comments>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 22:11:34 PST</pubDate>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<category>Google SEO</category>
<guid>http://sphinn.com/story/86562</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Google has just added a new document inside the Google Webmaster Help archive which lists down all the best practices for a Blogger to succeed. The guide contains many tips for making the most of your blog........Pretty basic but useful :)<br/><br/>49 Vote(s) ]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[New seoMOZ Toolbar - A Review]]></title>
<link>http://sphinn.com/story/86670</link>
<comments>http://sphinn.com/story/86670</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 21:22:58 PST</pubDate>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<category>Google SEO</category>
<guid>http://sphinn.com/story/86670</guid>
<description><![CDATA[By Manda Otto, from New Edge Media:&quot;I received my invitation to officially beta test the new SEOmoz toolbar late Wednesday afternoon. I was all over it a mere 5 minutes later.&quot;They got permission to post this review- the first one.  I verified<br/><br/>50 Vote(s) ]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Google Search Engine Optimization Starter Guide Summary]]></title>
<link>http://sphinn.com/story/86385</link>
<comments>http://sphinn.com/story/86385</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 15:12:56 PST</pubDate>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<category>Google SEO</category>
<guid>http://sphinn.com/story/86385</guid>
<description><![CDATA[I wrote a summary of the helpful Google Search Engine Optimization Starter Guide for our SEO clients to use as they develop new pages or make changes to existing pages. Sort of a bullet list of Google's SEO guidelines. Maybe it will be useful to you<br/><br/>38 Vote(s) ]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Google Call SA Agencies 'Fraudulent' - Will Pick '5 Certified Providers']]></title>
<link>http://sphinn.com/story/86509</link>
<comments>http://sphinn.com/story/86509</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 11:52:02 PST</pubDate>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<category>Google SEO</category>
<guid>http://sphinn.com/story/86509</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Working for one of the largest agencies in South Africa, I can confirm we haven't been contacted by Google to discuss certification in any way. In my opinion this is another bankroll for Google, there is no way they can monitor every single agency t<br/><br/>41 Vote(s) ]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Matt Cutts, If This Paid Link Were A Snake It Would Have Bitten You In The Ass]]></title>
<link>http://sphinn.com/story/86557</link>
<comments>http://sphinn.com/story/86557</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 08:59:33 PST</pubDate>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<category>Google SEO</category>
<guid>http://sphinn.com/story/86557</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Can Matt Cutts detect paid links embedded in content when he is looking right at them?<br/><br/>47 Vote(s) ]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[30 Techniques To Avoid  (According to Best Practice SEO by Google)]]></title>
<link>http://sphinn.com/story/84773</link>
<comments>http://sphinn.com/story/84773</comments>
<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 08:16:37 PST</pubDate>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<category>Google SEO</category>
<guid>http://sphinn.com/story/84773</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Shaun Anderson made a summary of Google's recently released SEO Starter Guide by highlighting all techniques you should try to avoid.<br/><br/>50 Vote(s) ]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[How Much Does Semantic HTML Structure Matter for SEO?]]></title>
<link>http://sphinn.com/story/84539</link>
<comments>http://sphinn.com/story/84539</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 15:21:22 PST</pubDate>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<category>Google SEO</category>
<guid>http://sphinn.com/story/84539</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Web standards and Google ....<br/><br/>40 Vote(s) ]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Google Gives out SEO Advice]]></title>
<link>http://sphinn.com/story/84650</link>
<comments>http://sphinn.com/story/84650</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 01:18:29 PST</pubDate>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<category>Google SEO</category>
<guid>http://sphinn.com/story/84650</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Interesting move from Google, it's the 1st time I've seen them go granular, but hey, what's with the dig at shadyseo! ;)<br/><br/>89 Vote(s) ]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Hidden Quantcast links on Digg.com]]></title>
<link>http://sphinn.com/story/84412</link>
<comments>http://sphinn.com/story/84412</comments>
<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 07:25:33 PST</pubDate>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<category>Google SEO</category>
<guid>http://sphinn.com/story/84412</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Richard Baxter of SEOgadet uncovers and explores Quantcast's practice of including hidden links within its tracking code.  It can be seen on pages such as Digg.com Last.fm and Technorati.<br/><br/>44 Vote(s) ]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Aaron Wall Ranking In Top 10 For Lindsay Lohan Nude]]></title>
<link>http://sphinn.com/story/83521</link>
<comments>http://sphinn.com/story/83521</comments>
<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 05:29:22 PST</pubDate>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<category>Google SEO</category>
<guid>http://sphinn.com/story/83521</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Seems like someone made a profile on SEOBook, threw some spammy links to it, and it made to Google's first page. Yahoo Site Explorer shows 200+ backlinks where many seem to come from guestbooks, forums, and .jp/.tw sites. The keyword 'lindsay lohan <br/><br/>41 Vote(s) ]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Google Slowly Dropping PageRank From The Toolbar?]]></title>
<link>http://sphinn.com/story/83011</link>
<comments>http://sphinn.com/story/83011</comments>
<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 21:15:36 PST</pubDate>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<category>Google SEO</category>
<guid>http://sphinn.com/story/83011</guid>
<description><![CDATA[SER (supplier of juicy topics lately;0) - Does this surprise anyone? Well, we know a few things. We know Matt Cutts of Google, a very influential person at Google, has wanted Google to remove PageRank from the toolbar for a while now. We know Adam L<br/><br/>43 Vote(s) ]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Google Search Update Blows Up, Google Reverting Back Now]]></title>
<link>http://sphinn.com/story/82804</link>
<comments>http://sphinn.com/story/82804</comments>
<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 14:16:46 PST</pubDate>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<category>Google SEO</category>
<guid>http://sphinn.com/story/82804</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Interestingly I was watching some threads over the weekend where peeps were losing it on a few boards... now we know...Search Engine Round Table - I decided to wait on reporting on this thread until Monday morning, to see if things settle. In sh<br/><br/>35 Vote(s) ]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[SEO Company, SEO and Search Engine Optimization Google Results Are a Disgrace]]></title>
<link>http://sphinn.com/story/82134</link>
<comments>http://sphinn.com/story/82134</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 10:09:54 PDT</pubDate>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<category>Google SEO</category>
<guid>http://sphinn.com/story/82134</guid>
<description><![CDATA[SEOmoz is right, more than that: The key phrase SEO company is not the exception. Take a look at the more generic terms SEO and search engine optimization and you'll quickly realize that the Google results there are even less relevant.<br/><br/>37 Vote(s) ]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Internal Links - Only The First Link Counts in Google?]]></title>
<link>http://sphinn.com/story/81598</link>
<comments>http://sphinn.com/story/81598</comments>
<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 17:08:47 PDT</pubDate>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<category>Google SEO</category>
<guid>http://sphinn.com/story/81598</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Shaun from Hobo shares the results of another SEO test: &quot;What does Google count, when it finds two links on the same page going to the same internal destination page?&quot;<br/><br/>55 Vote(s) ]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[95 Killer Tips from Scary SEO's 19 Session Speakers]]></title>
<link>http://sphinn.com/story/81951</link>
<comments>http://sphinn.com/story/81951</comments>
<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 11:17:06 PDT</pubDate>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<category>Google SEO</category>
<guid>http://sphinn.com/story/81951</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Dana Lookadoo writes:&quot;Two Days of Search Training that will make you so good it will be Scary IT WORKED!!!! I spent two days in training, living and breathing search. I gained knowledge that will help elevate my clients' rankings, and I am no lo<br/><br/>51 Vote(s) ]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Myths &amp; Truths About Google GrayBar PR]]></title>
<link>http://sphinn.com/story/80634</link>
<comments>http://sphinn.com/story/80634</comments>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 02:33:48 PDT</pubDate>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<category>Google SEO</category>
<guid>http://sphinn.com/story/80634</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Toolbar PR is something many webmasters have no more trust in. The common opinions are:    * PR (change) often seems to have nothing to do with rankings;    * Toolbar PR seems not to reflect the true website authority.<br/><br/>46 Vote(s) ]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Key Relevance Review of Google Patents]]></title>
<link>http://sphinn.com/story/81093</link>
<comments>http://sphinn.com/story/81093</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 20:51:01 PDT</pubDate>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<category>Google SEO</category>
<guid>http://sphinn.com/story/81093</guid>
<description><![CDATA[A review of the 159 granted patents assigned to Google (169 if Exaflop counts.)  A little more than one third focus primarily upon search indexing algorithms, and almost two thirds were developed in-house rather than acquired.<br/><br/>59 Vote(s) ]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[NoFollow and PageRank Sculpting is it Worth the Effort?]]></title>
<link>http://sphinn.com/story/80549</link>
<comments>http://sphinn.com/story/80549</comments>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 13:17:42 PDT</pubDate>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<category>Google SEO</category>
<guid>http://sphinn.com/story/80549</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Google have downplayed the importance of PageRank sculpting and Graywolf follows this up with a useful analogy.<br/><br/>59 Vote(s) ]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Free links to your site…from google.com]]></title>
<link>http://sphinn.com/story/80108</link>
<comments>http://sphinn.com/story/80108</comments>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 06:15:48 PDT</pubDate>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<category>Google SEO</category>
<guid>http://sphinn.com/story/80108</guid>
<description><![CDATA[A nofollow waiting to happen? Probably, unless Google want their domain to become the world's biggest spam farm.<br/><br/>53 Vote(s) ]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Does Google Have A Glass Ceiling?]]></title>
<link>http://sphinn.com/story/79626</link>
<comments>http://sphinn.com/story/79626</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 12:51:54 PDT</pubDate>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<category>Google SEO</category>
<guid>http://sphinn.com/story/79626</guid>
<description><![CDATA[A small &quot;Google awakening&quot; happened on Tuesday night. There seems to to be a &quot;Google Glass Ceiling&quot; in the serps for certain types of sites. Mileage might vary, but if your site is pulling more weight than Google thinks it should, there is mounting <br/><br/>47 Vote(s) ]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Google Sitelinks Research, Examples, Theories &amp; Best Practices (Project Big Water)]]></title>
<link>http://sphinn.com/story/79336</link>
<comments>http://sphinn.com/story/79336</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 09:17:15 PDT</pubDate>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<category>Google SEO</category>
<guid>http://sphinn.com/story/79336</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Google Sitelinks is an automated program that displays between three and eight indented links for the top ranking website shown for particular search query.  This blog post is dedicated to my research of the Google Sitelinks program and will include<br/><br/>45 Vote(s) ]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Fix Your 404s the Easy Way: Free Direct Text Links Advice from Matt Cutts]]></title>
<link>http://sphinn.com/story/78755</link>
<comments>http://sphinn.com/story/78755</comments>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 09:54:03 PDT</pubDate>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<category>Google SEO</category>
<guid>http://sphinn.com/story/78755</guid>
<description><![CDATA[If you haven't been checking Webmaster Tools, then you probably don't know that you can get a list of pages that have broken links, pointing at your site. You can contact the site owners to ask them fix the links to get links instead of spending hou<br/><br/>53 Vote(s) ]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[2009 Google Flash SEO Update]]></title>
<link>http://sphinn.com/story/78674</link>
<comments>http://sphinn.com/story/78674</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 02:14:55 PDT</pubDate>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<category>Google SEO</category>
<guid>http://sphinn.com/story/78674</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Months of research and cases studies to illustrate how Google handles Flash since the update in July.<br/><br/>81 Vote(s) ]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[How To Diagnose Your Site with Google Advanced Search]]></title>
<link>http://sphinn.com/story/77324</link>
<comments>http://sphinn.com/story/77324</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 14:14:50 PDT</pubDate>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<category>Google SEO</category>
<guid>http://sphinn.com/story/77324</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Here are few tips on how to diagnose both on-site and off-site issues with Google Search and its advanced operators.<br/><br/>46 Vote(s) ]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Google social profiling for online networks]]></title>
<link>http://sphinn.com/story/77048</link>
<comments>http://sphinn.com/story/77048</comments>
<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 08:54:45 PDT</pubDate>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<category>Google SEO</category>
<guid>http://sphinn.com/story/77048</guid>
<description><![CDATA[David Harry covers a variety of patents Google have for social profiling - while illustrating the massive intrusion into privacy.However, the suggestion is that this could be a way to monetise social media, but there's no getting around user int<br/><br/>40 Vote(s) ]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Google &quot;Directory Submission&quot; Update]]></title>
<link>http://sphinn.com/story/76506</link>
<comments>http://sphinn.com/story/76506</comments>
<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 15:15:44 PDT</pubDate>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<category>Google SEO</category>
<guid>http://sphinn.com/story/76506</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Google removed &quot;directory submissions&quot; from their Google Webmaster Guideline suggestions earlier today!<br/><br/>60 Vote(s) ]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Advanced Website Diagnostics with Google Webmaster Tools]]></title>
<link>http://sphinn.com/story/75946</link>
<comments>http://sphinn.com/story/75946</comments>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 17:24:49 PDT</pubDate>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<category>Google SEO</category>
<guid>http://sphinn.com/story/75946</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Running a website can be complicated-so we've provided Google Webmaster Tools to help webmasters to recognize potential issues before they become real problems. Some of the issues that you can spot there are relatively small (such as having duplicat<br/><br/>55 Vote(s) ]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Is Martha Stewart Engaging in a Shady Link Exchange?]]></title>
<link>http://sphinn.com/story/75547</link>
<comments>http://sphinn.com/story/75547</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 07:03:19 PDT</pubDate>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<category>Google SEO</category>
<guid>http://sphinn.com/story/75547</guid>
<description><![CDATA[You know there are days where you really just cant believe the things you see. Cruising on over to the Martha Stewart blog you'll read how they are running a contest and REQUIRING a link back to Martha's Blog to be entered … (screen shot for posteri<br/><br/>58 Vote(s) ]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Google PageRank Update, This Weekend!]]></title>
<link>http://sphinn.com/story/74952</link>
<comments>http://sphinn.com/story/74952</comments>
<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 01:06:57 PDT</pubDate>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<category>Google SEO</category>
<guid>http://sphinn.com/story/74952</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Matt Cutts posted the following comment on his blog on September 24, 2008: &quot;I wouldn't be surprised if new PageRanks started showing up this weekend or so.&quot;http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/traveling-light-posting/#comment-133935<br/><br/>75 Vote(s) ]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Sorry Google Webmaster Team, But I Gotta Call BS On This One]]></title>
<link>http://sphinn.com/story/74589</link>
<comments>http://sphinn.com/story/74589</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 14:20:49 PDT</pubDate>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<category>Google SEO</category>
<guid>http://sphinn.com/story/74589</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Some direct evidence countering the suggestions Google Webmaster Central blog made yesterday.<br/><br/>56 Vote(s) ]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Google Says, Don't Rewrite Dynamic URLs To Static URLs]]></title>
<link>http://sphinn.com/story/74522</link>
<comments>http://sphinn.com/story/74522</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 11:55:32 PDT</pubDate>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<category>Google SEO</category>
<guid>http://sphinn.com/story/74522</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Hrmm... so what about all thos DNN, Joomla, TYPO3 rewrites i've written, do i have to change them back?<br/><br/>60 Vote(s) ]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Google says Stay Away From URL Rewriting! Seriously?]]></title>
<link>http://sphinn.com/story/74404</link>
<comments>http://sphinn.com/story/74404</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 07:48:37 PDT</pubDate>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<category>Google SEO</category>
<guid>http://sphinn.com/story/74404</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Unbelievable post on the Official Google Webmaster Central Blog telling us to NOT use URL rewriting as it has no advantage and is too dangerous. Uh, hello?! The post itself uses URL rewriting.<br/><br/>73 Vote(s) ]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Google News &amp; Indexing Old Stories As New]]></title>
<link>http://sphinn.com/story/73103</link>
<comments>http://sphinn.com/story/73103</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 09:07:27 PDT</pubDate>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<category>Google SEO</category>
<guid>http://sphinn.com/story/73103</guid>
<description><![CDATA[A further look at the initial discovery of Michael Gray's about the Google News indexing issues.<br/><br/>40 Vote(s) ]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Are Blogs are waste of time in Google now]]></title>
<link>http://sphinn.com/story/72791</link>
<comments>http://sphinn.com/story/72791</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 13:00:11 PDT</pubDate>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<category>Google SEO</category>
<guid>http://sphinn.com/story/72791</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Dave Naylor: Are we starting to see Google turn the screw of &quot;we don't like you&quot; on blogs? For many months rumours had been flying around that Google was going to purge a lot of blogs, at the beginning of last week I noticed that some of my pages we<br/><br/>46 Vote(s) ]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Google Fundamentally Changes The Way They Handle 302 Redirects (Welcome Back 302 Hijack!)]]></title>
<link>http://sphinn.com/story/72754</link>
<comments>http://sphinn.com/story/72754</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 12:19:13 PDT</pubDate>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<category>Google SEO</category>
<guid>http://sphinn.com/story/72754</guid>
<description><![CDATA[In what appears to be a reversion back to the way Google originally handled 302 redirects a few years ago, it looks as if now it has again become possible to hijack websites in the serps.<br/><br/>54 Vote(s) ]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Demystifying the the &quot;duplicate content penalty&quot; - Officially]]></title>
<link>http://sphinn.com/story/72299</link>
<comments>http://sphinn.com/story/72299</comments>
<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 14:00:44 PDT</pubDate>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<category>Google SEO</category>
<guid>http://sphinn.com/story/72299</guid>
<description><![CDATA[From the post, &quot;Let's put this to bed once and for all, folks: There's no such thing as a &quot;duplicate content penalty.&quot; At least, not in the way most people mean when they say that.&quot;<br/><br/>55 Vote(s) ]]></description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
